Offshore Drilling: Its All in How You Ask
by Steve Kretzmann August 7th, 2008 in Oil, US politics
Why did Barack Obama soften his stance on offshore drilling last week? I asked this question of a campaign insider, who is also a long time environmentalist. The answer back was basically: “Don’t blame Obama, we (environmentalists) didn’t do our work well in the community, which is why the American people think that offshore drilling is the answer to our energy crisis”.
A great overview of the issue just posted by the Yale Forum backs up a poll from last week conducted by The Wilderness Society.
It turns out that its really all about how you ask the question. If the choice is between investing in clean energy (wind, solar, tire gauges) and offshore drilling, then clean energy wins coming and going (76% to 19% in the TWS poll).
So the real question is: why has the mainstream media so uncritically reported the polls in which drilling is presented as the only option to lower gas prices - despite the fact that there is no way drilling will have any significant impact on the price of gas.
The costs and environmental damage caused by offshore drilling of an already finite resource as a solution to rising oil and gas costs makes no sense whatsoever.
There are other alternatives that could and would create new jobs stimulus at all ends of the educational/economic spectrum, economic growth at both the national and international level (as presumably and hopefully America would use its newfound focus and technological ability to become strong in alternative energy material and technology), and provide Americans with alternatives that not only would provide the country with a much cleaner source of power, but a safer one, reducing their dependence on oil, and at the same time preventing the inevitable crisis point when it runs out anyway.
I would love to include comments about animal habitats, precious ocean seabeds, and pristine wilderness areas being irreparably destroyed, but since people so often seem oblivious to the importance behind protecting those, how about facing the fact that if we continue to rely on oil, it will continue to climb higher and higher, until its gone anyway? The amount of oil America could actually extract for itself is simply not an issue; its like staring at the last steer on earth and saying "there's plenty of hamburger left" and killing it instead of just eating something else.
That society has been shown only the tip of the energy crisis iceberg and still sticks its head in the crude as if that will make it all go away somehow baffles me. It also scares me.
The less dependent on oil we are now, the better things will be for everyone..economically, environmentally, ethically, and certainly in terms of the health and well being of future generations.